EN

Tracker / CVE-2026-53158

CVE-2026-53158

Media 5.5

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: misc: fastrpc: Fix NULL pointer dereference in rpmsg callback A NULL pointer dereference was observed on Hawi at boot when the DSP sends a glink message before fastrpc_rpmsg_probe() has completed initialization: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000178 pc : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x34/0x8c lr : fastrpc_rpmsg_callback+0x3c/0xcc [fastrpc] ... Call trace: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x34/0x8c (P) fastrpc_rpmsg_callback+0x3c/0xcc [fastrpc] qcom_glink_native_rx+0x538/0x6a4 qcom_glink_smem_intr+0x14/0x24 [qcom_glink_smem] The faulting address 0x178 corresponds to the lock variable inside struct fastrpc_channel_ctx, confirming that cctx is NULL when fastrpc_rpmsg_callback() attempts to take the spinlock. There are two issues here. First, dev_set_drvdata() is called before spin_lock_init() and idr_init(), leaving a window where the callback can retrieve a valid cctx pointer but operate on an uninitialized spinlock. Second, the rpmsg channel becomes live as soon as the driver is bound, so fastrpc_rpmsg_callback() can fire before dev_set_drvdata() is called at all, resulting in dev_get_drvdata() returning NULL. Fix both issues by moving all cctx initialization ahead of dev_set_drvdata() so the structure is fully initialized before it becomes visible to the callback, and add a NULL check in fastrpc_rpmsg_callback() as a guard against any remaining window.

Prodotti e versioni affette

linux linux_kernel
linux linux_kernel · 5.1 → 5.10.260
linux linux_kernel · 5.11 → 5.15.211
linux linux_kernel · 5.16 → 6.1.177
linux linux_kernel · 6.13 → 6.18.36
linux linux_kernel · 6.19 → 7.0.13
linux linux_kernel · 6.2 → 6.6.143
linux linux_kernel · 6.7 → 6.12.94

Analisi

Questa pagina non è ancora indicizzabile.Finché non contiene un’analisi originale — cosa espone davvero, come verificare in due minuti se un sistema è stato toccato, cosa fare se lo è stato — la pagina resta noindex. È il database a deciderlo, non il modello di pagina.

Riferimenti