EN

Tracker / CVE-2026-46274

CVE-2026-46274

Alta 7.8

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io-wq: check that the predecessor is hashed in io_wq_remove_pending() io_wq_remove_pending() needs to fix up wq->hash_tail[] if the cancelled work was the tail of its hash bucket. When doing this, it checks whether the preceding entry in acct->work_list has the same hash value, but never checks that the predecessor is hashed at all. io_get_work_hash() is simply atomic_read(&work->flags) >> IO_WQ_HASH_SHIFT, and the hash bits are never set for non-hashed work, so it returns 0. Thus, when a hashed bucket-0 work is cancelled while a non-hashed work is its list predecessor, the check spuriously passes and a pointer to the non-hashed io_kiocb is stored in wq->hash_tail[0]. Because non-hashed work is dequeued via the fast path in io_get_next_work(), which never touches hash_tail[], the stale pointer is never cleared. Therefore, after the non-hashed io_kiocb completes and is freed back to req_cachep, wq->hash_tail[0] is a dangling pointer. The io_wq is per-task (tctx->io_wq) and survives ring open/close, so the dangling pointer persists for the lifetime of the task; the next hashed bucket-0 enqueue dereferences it in io_wq_insert_work() and wq_list_add_after() writes through freed memory. Add the missing io_wq_is_hashed() check so a non-hashed predecessor never inherits a hash_tail[] slot.

Prodotti e versioni affette

linux linux_kernel
linux linux_kernel · 5.8.6 → 5.9
linux linux_kernel · 5.9.1 → 6.6.141
linux linux_kernel · 6.13 → 6.18.33
linux linux_kernel · 6.19 → 7.0.10
linux linux_kernel · 6.7 → 6.12.91

Analisi

Questa pagina non è ancora indicizzabile.Finché non contiene un’analisi originale — cosa espone davvero, come verificare in due minuti se un sistema è stato toccato, cosa fare se lo è stato — la pagina resta noindex. È il database a deciderlo, non il modello di pagina.

Riferimenti