59.289 CVE seguite
803 Sfruttate ora
188 Usate dai ransomware
Ultima sincronia
CVE Tracker
59.289 CVE
Dieci fornitori seguiti per identificativo CPE, non per parola chiave: una CVE compare qui quando NVD dichiara quali prodotti tocca, di solito qualche giorno dopo la pubblicazione.
| Identificativo | Gravità, ordina dal più alto | Prodotto e difetto | EPSS, ordina dal più alto | In KEV dal, ordinato dal più alto |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-57834 | CRIT 10.0 | apache traffic_server Apache Traffic Server allows request smuggling if chunked messages are malformed. This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 8.0.0 through 8.1.11, from 9.0.0 through 9.2.14, from 10.0.0 through 10.1.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.2. | 0,6% | — |
| CVE-2026-57822 | MED 6.5 | apache artemis When the broker is processing message-based management requests, sent by an authenticated messaging client that is authorized with MANAGE permission to perform management-via-messaging, the parameter processing can trigger Java deserialization of certain metho | 0,7% | — |
| CVE-2026-57821 | HIGH 8.1 | apache fineract A SQL Injection vulnerability exists in Apache Fineract's Office Search API (GET /api/v1/offices) in versions up to and including 1.14.0. The orderBy request parameter is concatenated into a SQL query without sufficient validation, allowing an authenticated us | 0,7% | — |
| CVE-2026-57819 | HIGH 7.5 | apache cxf Apache CXF allows to set a limit on the number of form parameters in a JAX-RS message via the "maxFormParameterCount" configuration option. However, no default limit is set which may lead to denial of service attacks when processing requests with very large n | 0,7% | — |
| CVE-2026-57818 | HIGH 8.1 | apache cxf A race condition in JCacheCodeDataProvider allows an attacker to redeem a single authorization code multiple times via concurrent requests, resulting in the issuance of multiple distinct, valid access tokens. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3, | 0,5% | — |
| CVE-2026-57817 | HIGH 8.1 | apache cxf The OpenID Connect Core 1.0 specification mandates that the RP MUST validate the `c_hash` parameter when operating in the Hybrid Flow. If an Apache CXF RP is integrated with a non-compliant or misconfigured Identity Provider (IdP) that omits the `c_hash`, the | 0,7% | — |
| CVE-2026-57308 | CRIT 9.8 | apache syncope Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache Syncope. An administrator with adequate entitlements can achieve execution of arbitrary SQL via stacked queries, leveraging unsanitized sort parameter | 0,8% | — |
| CVE-2026-57260 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor The application opened a PDF file containing an abnormal Unity 3D object. During parsing, the application incorrectly resolved a portion of the abnormal object as a pointer and used it as a valid address, ultimately causing the application to crash. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57259 | MED 6.5 | foxit pdf_editor The input file does not need to be strictly in a structurally valid PDF format. Instead, after reviewing the content, the original document disguised as a PDF will be sent to the parser. Malicious documents will construct malicious external entities that, thro | 0,4% | — |
| CVE-2026-57258 | MED 6.1 | foxit pdf_editor The PRC file header parsing logic trusts the constructed file structure description information, assumes that the underlying array contains elements and reads them, leading to out-of-bounds reads and application crashes. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57257 | MED 6.1 | foxit pdf_editor During the PRC parsing stage, there is a lack of boundary verification for the PRC entity index, which leads to an out-of-bounds read of the entity array. As a result, the application crashes. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57256 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor When the application opens a PDF and executes JavaScript, it performs abnormal operations on the list box field, and this operation is repeated after the form is reset. During this process, the application failed to adequately verify the validity of the form o | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57255 | MED 6.1 | foxit pdf_editor The application opens a PDF containing an abnormal color space whose attributes reference a valid but semantically malformed function. The function's output is not validated; when subsequently read, it produces an illegal pointer that accesses an out-of-bounds | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57254 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor There is an abnormal annotation within the PDF that is referenced by other objects. When the application parses the PDF, it fails to perform proper type checking, ultimately causing the application to crash. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57253 | MED 6.1 | foxit pdf_editor An abnormal image object causes the renderer to enter the wrong processing branch. When converting the scan lines, an invalid image buffer pointer is used, resulting in the application crashing. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57252 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor When the application opens a PDF file, during the process of JavaScript deleting pages and removing attachment annotations, it will cause the attachment panel to continue accessing invalid pointers, eventually leading to the application crashing. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57251 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor The application opens a PDF, but the cloud-like appearance of the construction process lacks proper setting of an upper limit and consistency checks. Out-of-bounds access to the underlying array is exposed, ultimately leading to a crash of the application. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57250 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor When the application opens a PDF and JavaScript resets the form fields, the script re-enters the interface. The underlying native object is damaged, but the application does not perform validation. The function call on the damaged object leads to the applicati | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57249 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor After the application opened the PDF file, the script first reset the annotation status, then triggered the reset form event by additional action. During the re-entry process, the application access invalid objects and crashed. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57248 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor When the application opens a PDF file and JavaScript writes annotation attributes, there is a lack of sufficient object type and argument checks. As a result, due to the damage to the internal structure of the annotations, it causes the application to crash du | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57247 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor The application re-enters the document structure via field processing and deletes the current page, and then continues using the field objects obtained before deletion, triggering an illegal read and crashing. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57246 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor When dealing with abnormally constructed objects, there is a lack of argument validation; JavaScript triggers signature verification, but the signature plugin does not perform validation when copying the abnormal string, causing the application to crash. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57245 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor When the application opens a PDF, traverses and builds the annotation elements related to hyperlinks, it fails to validate the abnormal annotation relationships and field combinations. This results in the internal objects entering an invalid state. Eventually, | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57244 | HIGH 7.8 | foxit pdf_editor After JavaScript resetting the form, the synchronization process lacks re-entry protection and object lifecycle verification, resulting in the failure of the control pointer during the traversal process. After the pointer fails, it still continues to dereferen | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2026-57243 | MED 6.1 | foxit pdf_editor During the process of page opening and form formatting, a JavaScript reentrancy results in an inconsistent document status. Subsequently, with outdated page information, the application attempts to access invalid addresses, causing the application to crash. | 0,2% | — |