58.462 CVE seguite
793 Sfruttate ora
188 Usate dai ransomware
Ultima sincronia
CVE Tracker
58.462 CVE
Dieci fornitori seguiti per identificativo CPE, non per parola chiave: una CVE compare qui quando NVD dichiara quali prodotti tocca, di solito qualche giorno dopo la pubblicazione.
| Identificativo | Gravità, ordina dal più alto | Prodotto e difetto | EPSS, ordina dal più alto | In KEV dal, ordinato dal più basso |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-6657 | MED 6.1 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.2-11.6.5.1, a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also known as the BIG-IP Configuration utility. | 0,6% | — |
| CVE-2019-6656 | HIGH 7.5 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager BIG-IP APM Edge Client before version 7.1.8 (7180.2019.508.705) logs the full apm session ID in the log files. Vulnerable versions of the client are bundled with BIG-IP APM versions 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14,1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1. | 1,4% | — |
| CVE-2019-6655 | MED 5.3 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On versions 13.0.0-13.1.0.1, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.6.1-11.6.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.9, BIG-IP platforms where AVR, ASM, APM, PEM, AFM, and/or AAM is provisioned may leak sensitive data. | 1,1% | — |
| CVE-2019-6654 | MED 4.3 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On versions 14.0.0-14.1.2, 13.0.0-13.1.3, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.1-11.6.5, the BIG-IP system fails to perform Martian Address Filtering (As defined in RFC 1812 section 5.3.7) on the control plane (management interface). This may allow attackers on an adjacent | 0,5% | — |
| CVE-2019-6653 | MED 5.4 | f5 big-iq_centralized_management There is a Stored Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in the undisclosed page of a BIG-IQ 6.0.0-6.1.0 or 5.2.0-5.4.0 system. The attack can be stored by users granted the Device Manager and Administrator roles. | 0,6% | — |
| CVE-2019-6652 | MED 6.5 | f5 big-iq_centralized_management In BIG-IQ 6.0.0-6.1.0, services for stats do not require authentication nor do they implement any form of Transport Layer Security (TLS). | 0,6% | — |
| CVE-2019-6651 | MED 5.3 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager In BIG-IP 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.1-11.6.4, BIG-IQ 7.0.0, 6.0.0-6.1.0,5.2.0-5.4.0, iWorkflow 2.3.0, and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, the Configuration utility login page may not follow best security practic | 1,1% | — |
| CVE-2019-6650 | CRIT 9.1 | f5 big-ip_application_security_manager F5 BIG-IP ASM 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.6.0-11.6.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.9 may expose sensitive information and allow the system configuration to be modified when using non-default settings. | 1,3% | — |
| CVE-2019-6649 | CRIT 9.1 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager F5 BIG-IP 15.0.0, 14.1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.6.0-11.6.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.9 and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1 may expose sensitive information and allow the system configuration to be modified when using non-default Config | 1,3% | — |
| CVE-2019-6648 | MED 4.4 | f5 container_ingress_service On version 1.9.0, If DEBUG logging is enable, F5 Container Ingress Service (CIS) for Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift (k8s-bigip-ctlr) log files may contain BIG-IP secrets such as SSL Private Keys and Private key Passphrases as provided as inputs by an AS3 Dec | 0,3% | — |
| CVE-2019-6647 | MED 5.3 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.2-11.6.4, when processing authentication attempts for control-plane users MCPD leaks a small amount of memory. Under rare conditions attackers with access to the management interf | 1,4% | — |
| CVE-2019-6646 | HIGH 8.8 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP 11.5.2-11.6.4 and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, REST users with guest privileges may be able to escalate their privileges and run commands with admin privileges. | 1,5% | — |
| CVE-2019-6645 | HIGH 7.5 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.1.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, 11.5.2-11.6.4, FTP traffic passing through a Virtual Server with both an active FTP profile associated and connection mirroring configured may lead to a TMM crash causing the configured HA action to be | 1,3% | — |
| CVE-2019-6644 | CRIT 9.4 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager Similar to the issue identified in CVE-2018-12120, on versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, and 12.1.0-12.1.4 BIG-IP will bind a debug nodejs process to all interfaces when invoked. This may expose the process to unauthorized users if the p | 1,4% | — |
| CVE-2019-6643 | HIGH 7.5 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.2, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, and 11.5.2-11.6.4, an attacker sending specifically crafted DHCPv6 requests through a BIG-IP virtual server configured with a DHCPv6 profile may be able to cause the TMM process to p | 1,3% | — |
| CVE-2019-6642 | HIGH 8.8 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager In BIG-IP 15.0.0, 14.0.0-14.1.0.5, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.4.2, and 11.5.2-11.6.4, BIG-IQ 6.0.0-6.1.0 and 5.1.0-5.4.0, iWorkflow 2.3.0, and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, authenticated users with the ability to upload files (via scp, for example) can escalate | 1,8% | — |
| CVE-2019-6641 | MED 6.5 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, undisclosed requests can cause iControl REST processes to crash. The attack can only come from an authenticated user; all roles are capable of performing the attack. Unauthenticated users cannot perform this attack. | 2,0% | — |
| CVE-2019-6640 | MED 5.3 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4, 11.6.1-11.6.3.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.8, SNMP exposes sensitive configuration objects over insecure transmission channels. This issue is exposed when a passphrase is inserted into various p | 1,1% | — |
| CVE-2019-6639 | MED 4.8 | f5 big-ip_advanced_firewall_manager On BIG-IP (AFM, PEM) 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4, 11.6.1-11.6.3.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.8, an undisclosed TMUI pages for AFM and PEM Subscriber management are vulnerable to a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) issue. This is a co | 0,7% | — |
| CVE-2019-6638 | MED 6.5 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5 and 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, Malformed http requests made to an undisclosed iControl REST endpoint can lead to infinite loop of the restjavad process. | 2,0% | — |
| CVE-2019-6637 | MED 6.5 | f5 big-ip_application_security_manager On BIG-IP (ASM) 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, and 12.1.0-12.1.4, Application logic abuse of ASM REST endpoints can lead to instability of BIG-IP system. Exploitation of this issue causes excessive memory consumption which results in the Li | 1,5% | — |
| CVE-2019-6636 | HIGH 8.4 | f5 big-ip_advanced_firewall_manager On BIG-IP (AFM, ASM) 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4, and 11.5.1-11.6.4, a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in AFM feed list. In the worst case, an attacker can store a CSRF which results in code execution as the admin | 0,9% | — |
| CVE-2019-6635 | MED 4.4 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4, 11.6.1-11.6.3.4, and 11.5.1-11.5.8, when the BIG-IP system is licensed for Appliance mode, a user with either the Administrator or the Resource Administrator role can bypass Appliance | 0,4% | — |
| CVE-2019-6634 | MED 6.5 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, and 12.1.0-12.1.4, a high volume of malformed analytics report requests leads to instability in restjavad process. This causes issues with both iControl REST and some portions of TMUI. The attack req | 1,4% | — |
| CVE-2019-6633 | MED 4.4 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, and 11.5.1-11.6.4, when the BIG-IP system is licensed with Appliance mode, user accounts with Administrator and Resource Administrator roles can bypass Appliance mode restrictions. | 0,3% | — |