57.971 CVE seguite
788 Sfruttate ora
188 Usate dai ransomware
Ultima sincronia
CVE Tracker
57.971 CVE
Dieci fornitori seguiti per identificativo CPE, non per parola chiave: una CVE compare qui quando NVD dichiara quali prodotti tocca, di solito qualche giorno dopo la pubblicazione.
| Identificativo | Gravità, ordina dal più alto | Prodotto e difetto | EPSS, ordina dal più alto | In KEV dal, ordinato dal più basso |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-3640 | HIGH 7.0 | canonical ubuntu_linux A flaw use-after-free in function sco_sock_sendmsg() of the Linux kernel HCI subsystem was found in the way user calls ioct UFFDIO_REGISTER or other way triggers race condition of the call sco_conn_del() together with the call sco_sock_sendmsg() with the expec | 0,4% | — |
| CVE-2021-36376 | HIGH 7.8 | delta_project delta dandavison delta before 0.8.3 on Windows resolves an executable's pathname as a relative path from the current directory. | 0,4% | — |
| CVE-2021-36374 | MED 5.5 | apache ant When reading a specially crafted ZIP archive, or a derived formats, an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Commonly u | 2,6% | — |
| CVE-2021-36373 | MED 5.5 | apache ant When reading a specially crafted TAR archive an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that finally leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.1 | 2,5% | — |
| CVE-2021-36372 | CRIT 9.8 | apache ozone In Apache Ozone versions prior to 1.2.0, Initially generated block tokens are persisted to the metadata database and can be retrieved with authenticated users with permission to the key. Authenticated users may use them even after access is revoked. | 2,5% | — |
| CVE-2021-3635 | MED 4.4 | fedoraproject fedora A flaw was found in the Linux kernel netfilter implementation in versions prior to 5.5-rc7. A user with root (CAP_SYS_ADMIN) access is able to panic the system when issuing netfilter netflow commands. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2021-3626 | HIGH 8.8 | canonical multipass The Windows version of Multipass before 1.7.0 allowed any local process to connect to the localhost TCP control socket to perform mounts from the operating system to a guest, allowing for privilege escalation. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2021-36195 | MED 4.2 | fortinet fortiweb Multiple command injection vulnerabilities in the command line interpreter of FortiWeb versions 6.4.1, 6.4.0, 6.3.0 through 6.3.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.6, and 6.1.0 through 6.1.2 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying | 1,1% | — |
| CVE-2021-36194 | HIGH 8.8 | fortinet fortiweb Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the API controllers of FortiWeb 6.4.1, 6.4.0, and 6.3.0 through 6.3.15 may allow an authenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution via specially crafted requests. | 1,4% | — |
| CVE-2021-36193 | MED 6.7 | fortinet fortiweb Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the command line interpreter of FortiWeb before 6.4.2 may allow an authenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution via specially crafted commands. | 0,8% | — |
| CVE-2021-36192 | MED 5.2 | fortinet fortimanager An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor [CWE-200] vulnerability in FortiManager 7.0.1 and below, 6.4.6 and below, 6.2.x, 6.0.x, 5.6.0 may allow a FortiGate user to see scripts from other ADOMS. | 0,2% | — |
| CVE-2021-36191 | MED 4.1 | fortinet fortiweb A url redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') in Fortinet FortiWeb version 6.4.1 and below, 6.3.15 and below allows attacker to use the device as proxy via crafted GET parameters in requests to error handlers | 0,5% | — |
| CVE-2021-36190 | MED 5.5 | fortinet fortiweb A unintended proxy or intermediary ('confused deputy') in Fortinet FortiWeb version 6.4.1 and below, 6.3.15 and below allows an unauthenticated attacker to access protected hosts via crafted HTTP requests. | 0,8% | — |
| CVE-2021-36189 | MED 6.8 | fortinet forticlient_enterprise_management_server A missing encryption of sensitive data in Fortinet FortiClientEMS version 7.0.1 and below, version 6.4.4 and below allows attacker to information disclosure via inspecting browser decrypted data | 0,4% | — |
| CVE-2021-36188 | MED 6.1 | fortinet fortiweb A improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Fortinet FortiWeb version 6.4.1 and below, 6.3.15 and below allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted GET parameters in requests to login and e | 0,7% | — |
| CVE-2021-36187 | MED 5.3 | fortinet fortiweb A uncontrolled resource consumption in Fortinet FortiWeb version 6.4.0, version 6.3.15 and below, 6.2.5 and below allows attacker to cause a denial of service for webserver daemon via crafted HTTP requests | 1,4% | — |
| CVE-2021-36186 | HIGH 8.8 | fortinet fortiweb A stack-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiWeb version 6.4.0, version 6.3.15 and below, 6.2.5 and below allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests | 1,6% | — |
| CVE-2021-36185 | HIGH 8.8 | fortinet fortiwlm A improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') in Fortinet FortiWLM version 8.6.1 and below allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. | 1,9% | — |
| CVE-2021-36184 | HIGH 8.8 | fortinet fortiwlm A improper neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Fortinet FortiWLM version 8.6.1 and below allows attacker to disclosure device, users and database information via crafted HTTP requests. | 1,0% | — |
| CVE-2021-36183 | HIGH 7.4 | fortinet forticlient An improper authorization vulnerability [CWE-285] in FortiClient for Windows versions 7.0.1 and below and 6.4.2 and below may allow a local unprivileged attacker to escalate their privileges to SYSTEM via the named pipe responsible for Forticlient updates. | 0,3% | — |
| CVE-2021-36182 | HIGH 8.8 | fortinet fortiweb A Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('Command Injection') in Fortinet FortiWeb version 6.3.13 and below allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests | 1,9% | — |
| CVE-2021-36181 | LOW 3.1 | fortinet fortiportal A concurrent execution using shared resource with improper Synchronization vulnerability ('Race Condition') in the customer database interface of FortiPortal before 6.0.6 may allow an authenticated, low-privilege user to bring the underlying database data into | 0,4% | — |
| CVE-2021-36180 | HIGH 8.1 | fortinet fortiweb Multiple improper neutralization of special elements used in a command vulnerabilities [CWE-77] in FortiWeb management interface 6.4.1 and below, 6.3.15 and below, 6.2.5 and below may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via | 1,1% | — |
| CVE-2021-3618 | HIGH 7.4 | debian debian_linux ALPACA is an application layer protocol content confusion attack, exploiting TLS servers implementing different protocols but using compatible certificates, such as multi-domain or wildcard certificates. A MiTM attacker having access to victim's traffic at the | 2,0% | — |
| CVE-2021-36179 | HIGH 8.0 | fortinet fortiweb A stack-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiWeb version 6.3.14 and below, 6.2.4 and below allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted parameters in CLI command execution | 1,6% | — |