57.298 CVE tracked
782 Exploited now
186 Used by ransomware
Last sync
CVE Tracker
57.298 CVE
Ten vendors followed by CPE identifier, not by keyword: a CVE appears here once NVD says which products it affects — usually a few days after it is published.
| Identifier | Severity, sorted ascending | Product and flaw | EPSS, sort descending | In KEV since, sort descending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-20052 | MED 5.8 | cisco secure_firewall_threat_defense A vulnerability in the memory management handling for the Snort 3 Detection Engine of Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to restart. This vulnerability is | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2026-20015 | MED 5.8 | cisco adaptive_security_appliance_software A vulnerability in the IKEv2 feature of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition on an affected device that may impact the availability of services to devices else | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2026-20013 | MED 5.8 | cisco adaptive_security_appliance_software A vulnerability in the IKEv2 feature of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition on an affected device that may also impact the availability of services to devices | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2026-20007 | MED 5.8 | cisco secure_firewall_threat_defense A vulnerability in the Snort 2 and Snort 3 deep packet inspection of Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass configured Snort rules and allow traffic onto the network that should have been d | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2026-20006 | MED 5.8 | cisco secure_firewall_threat_defense A vulnerability in the TLS cryptography functionality of the Snort 3 Detection Engine of Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to unexpectedly restart, resultin | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2026-20005 | MED 5.8 | cisco cyber_vision Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort 3 Detection Engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to restart, resulting in an interruption of packet inspection. This vulnerabil | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2026-17908 | MED 5.8 | google chrome Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Printing in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security sev | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2025-60011 | MED 5.8 | juniper junos An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause an availability impact for downstream device | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-55018 | MED 5.8 | fortinet fortios An inconsistent interpretation of http requests ('http request smuggling') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4.3 through 6.4.16 may allow an unauthenticated atta | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-54659 | MED 5.8 | fortinet fortisoar_agent_communication_bridge An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR Agent Communication Bridge 1.1.0, FortiSOAR Agent Communication Bridge 1.0 all versions may allow an unauthenticated at | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2025-52951 | MED 5.8 | juniper junos A Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability in kernel filter processing of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker sending IPv6 traffic destined to the device to effectively bypass any firewall filtering configured on the interface. Due to an issue with | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2025-31365 | MED 5.8 | fortinet forticlient An Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability [CWE-94] in FortiClientMac 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.1 through 7.2.8 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's host via tricking the user into visit | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2025-27556 | MED 5.8 | djangoproject django An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.8 and 5.0 before 5.0.14. The NFKC normalization is slow on Windows. As a consequence, django.contrib.auth.views.LoginView, django.contrib.auth.views.LogoutView, and django.views.i18n.set_language are subject to | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2025-20288 | MED 5.8 | cisco unified_contact_center_express A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improp | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2025-20183 | MED 5.8 | cisco asyncos A vulnerability in a policy-based Cisco Application Visibility and Control (AVC) implementation of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Web Appliance could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to evade the antivirus scanner and download a malicious fil | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-20153 | MED 5.8 | cisco secure_email_gateway A vulnerability in the email filtering mechanism of Cisco Secure Email Gateway could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured rules and allow emails that should have been denied to flow through an affected device. This vulne | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-20145 | MED 5.8 | cisco ios_xr A vulnerability in the access control list (ACL) processing in the egress direction of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured ACL. This vulnerability exists because certain packets are handled incorrectl | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-1241 | MED 5.8 | fortra goanywhere_agents Encrypted values in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT prior to version 7.10.0 and GoAnywhere Agents prior to version 2.2.0 utilize a static IV which allows admin users to brute-force decryption of data. | 0.1% | — |
| CVE-2024-47507 | MED 5.8 | juniper junos An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause an integrity impact to the downstream device | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2024-47489 | MED 5.8 | juniper junos_os_evolved An Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (pfe) of the Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on ACX Series devices allows an unauthenticated, network based attacker sending specific transit protocol traffic to cau | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2024-43472 | MED 5.8 | microsoft edge_chromium Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2024-39561 | MED 5.8 | juniper junos An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the flow daemon (flowd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX4600 and SRX5000 Series allows an attacker to send TCP packets with SYN/FIN or SYN/RST flags, bypassing the expected blo | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2024-39533 | MED 5.8 | juniper junos An Unimplemented or Unsupported Feature in the UI vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX5000 Series and EX4600 Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a minor integrity impact to downstream networks.If one or more of the fo | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2024-30410 | MED 5.8 | juniper junos An Incorrect Behavior Order in the routing engine (RE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on EX4300 Series allows traffic intended to the device to reach the RE instead of being discarded when the discard term is set in loopback (lo0) interface. The intended functio | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2024-30389 | MED 5.8 | juniper junos An Incorrect Behavior Order vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on EX4300 Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause an integrity impact to networks downstream of the vulnerable device. When | 0.4% | — |