56.793 CVE tracked
777 Exploited now
183 Used by ransomware
Last sync
CVE Tracker
56.793 CVE
Ten vendors followed by CPE identifier, not by keyword: a CVE appears here once NVD says which products it affects — usually a few days after it is published.
| Identifier | Severity, sort descending | Product and flaw | EPSS, sorted descending | In KEV since, sort descending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-0914 | HIGH 7.5 | microsoft chakracore A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0912, CVE-2019-0913, CVE-20 | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2019-0913 | HIGH 7.5 | microsoft chakracore A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0912, CVE-2019-0914, CVE-20 | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2019-0912 | HIGH 7.5 | microsoft chakracore A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0913, CVE-2019-0914, CVE-20 | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2019-0753 | HIGH 7.5 | microsoft internet_explorer A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0739, CVE-2019-0752, CVE-2019-0862. | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2019-0611 | HIGH 7.5 | microsoft chakracore A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0592. | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2010-3453 | HIGH 9.3 | apache openoffice The WW8ListManager::WW8ListManager function in oowriter in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.x and 3.x before 3.3 does not properly handle an unspecified number of list levels in user-defined list styles in WW8 data in a Microsoft Word document, which allows remote attac | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2019-1106 | HIGH 7.5 | microsoft chakracore A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1062, CVE-2019-1092, CVE-20 | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2019-1103 | HIGH 7.5 | microsoft chakracore A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1062, CVE-2019-1092, CVE-20 | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2015-5351 | HIGH 8.8 | apache tomcat The (1) Manager and (2) Host Manager applications in Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2 establish sessions and send CSRF tokens for arbitrary new requests, which allows remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mecha | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2017-0259 | MED 4.7 | microsoft windows_10 The Windows kernel in Microsoft Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows authenticated attackers to obtain sensitive information via a specially crafted document, aka "Windows Kernel | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2014-0567 | HIGH 10.0 | adobe acrobat Heap-based buffer overflow in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.12 and 11.x before 11.0.09 on Windows and OS X allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-0561. | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2014-0561 | HIGH 10.0 | adobe acrobat Heap-based buffer overflow in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 10.x before 10.1.12 and 11.x before 11.0.09 on Windows and OS X allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-0567. | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2016-3312 | CRIT 9.1 | microsoft windows_10 ActiveSyncProvider in Microsoft Windows 10 Gold and 1511 allows attackers to discover credentials by leveraging failure of Universal Outlook to obtain a secure connection, aka "Universal Outlook Information Disclosure Vulnerability." | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-1999-1431 | MED 4.6 | microsoft zero_administration_kit ZAK in Appstation mode allows users to bypass the "Run only allowed apps" policy by starting Explorer from Office 97 applications (such as Word), installing software into the TEMP directory, and changing the name to that for an allowed application, such as Win | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2017-13715 | CRIT 9.8 | linux linux_kernel The __skb_flow_dissect function in net/core/flow_dissector.c in the Linux kernel before 4.3 does not ensure that n_proto, ip_proto, and thoff are initialized, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (system crash) or possibly execute arbitra | 9.7% | — |
| CVE-2018-8324 | MED 4.3 | microsoft edge An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly handles objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Edge Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8289, CVE-2018-8297, CVE-2018-8 | 9.6% | — |
| CVE-2018-8297 | MED 4.3 | microsoft edge An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly handles objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Edge Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8289, CVE-2018-8324, CVE-2018-8 | 9.6% | — |
| CVE-2018-8289 | MED 4.3 | microsoft edge An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly handles objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Edge Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8297, CVE-2018-8324, CVE-2018-8 | 9.6% | — |
| CVE-2017-8695 | MED 5.3 | microsoft live_meeting Windows Uniscribe in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Server 2016; Office 2007 SP3; Office 2010 SP2; Word Viewer; Office for Mac 20 | 9.6% | — |
| CVE-2023-3866 | HIGH 7.5 | linux linux_kernel In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate session id and tree id in the compound request This patch validate session id and tree id in compound request. If first operation in the compound is SMB2 ECHO request, ksmbd | 9.6% | — |
| CVE-2019-0703 | MED 6.5 | microsoft windows_10_1507 An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows SMB Server handles certain requests, aka 'Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0704, CVE-2019-0821. | 9.6% | |
| CVE-2018-12782 | CRIT 9.8 | adobe acrobat_dc Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have a Double Free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. | 9.6% | — |
| CVE-2009-2693 | MED 5.8 | apache tomcat Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.28 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.20 allows remote attackers to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in an entry in a WAR file, as demonstrated by a ../../bin/catalina.bat entry. | 9.6% | — |
| CVE-2007-1529 | MED 4.3 | microsoft windows_vista The LLTD Responder in Microsoft Windows Vista does not send the Mapper a response to a DISCOVERY packet if another host has sent a spoofed response first, which allows remote attackers to spoof arbitrary hosts via a network-based race condition, aka the "Total | 9.6% | — |
| CVE-2012-3502 | MED 4.3 | apache http_server The proxy functionality in (1) mod_proxy_ajp.c in the mod_proxy_ajp module and (2) mod_proxy_http.c in the mod_proxy_http module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.4.x before 2.4.3 does not properly determine the situations that require closing a back-end connection, | 9.6% | — |