60.361 CVE tracked
809 Exploited now
188 Used by ransomware
Last sync
CVE Tracker
60.361 CVE
Ten vendors followed by CPE identifier, not by keyword: a CVE appears here once NVD says which products it affects — usually a few days after it is published.
| Identifier | Severity, sort descending | Product and flaw | EPSS, sort descending | In KEV since, sorted descending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-58732 | HIGH 7.0 | microsoft windows_10_1507 Use after free in Inbox COM Objects allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2025-58731 | HIGH 7.0 | microsoft windows_11_22h2 Use after free in Inbox COM Objects allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-58730 | HIGH 7.0 | microsoft windows_10_1507 Use after free in Inbox COM Objects allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-58729 | MED 6.5 | microsoft windows_10_1507 Improper validation of specified type of input in Windows Local Session Manager (LSM) allows an authorized attacker to deny service over a network. | 1.1% | — |
| CVE-2025-58728 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10_1809 Use after free in Windows Bluetooth Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-58727 | HIGH 7.0 | microsoft windows_10_21h2 Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Connected Devices Platform Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2025-58726 | HIGH 7.5 | microsoft windows_10_1507 Improper access control in Windows SMB Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2025-58725 | HIGH 7.0 | microsoft windows_10_1507 Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows COM allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2025-58724 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft azure_connected_machine_agent Improper access control in Azure Connected Machine Agent allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | 0.6% | — |
| CVE-2025-58722 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10_1607 Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows DWM allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | 2.2% | — |
| CVE-2025-58720 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10_1809 Use of a cryptographic primitive with a risky implementation in Windows Cryptographic Services allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2025-58719 | MED 4.7 | microsoft windows_10_1607 Use after free in Connected Devices Platform Service (Cdpsvc) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-58718 | HIGH 8.8 | microsoft remote_desktop_client Use after free in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | 0.6% | — |
| CVE-2025-58717 | MED 6.5 | microsoft windows_10_1507 Out-of-bounds read in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2025-58716 | HIGH 8.8 | microsoft windows_10_1507 Improper input validation in Microsoft Windows Speech allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-58715 | HIGH 8.8 | microsoft windows_10_1507 Integer overflow or wraparound in Microsoft Windows Speech allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-58714 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10_1507 Improper access control in Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2025-58693 | MED 6.5 | fortinet fortivoice An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiVoice 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, FortiVoice 7.0.0 through 7.0.7 allows a privileged attacker to delete files from the underlying filesystem via crafted H | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2025-58692 | HIGH 8.8 | fortinet fortivoice An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command ("SQL Injection") vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiVoice 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, FortiVoice 7.0.0 through 7.0.7 allows an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized cod | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2025-58474 | MED 5.3 | f5 big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewall When BIG-IP Advanced WAF is configured on a virtual server with Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection or when an NGINX server is configured with App Protect Bot Defense, undisclosed requests can disrupt new client requests. Note: Software versions whi | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-58457 | MED 4.3 | apache zookeeper Improper permission check in ZooKeeper AdminServer lets authorized clients to run snapshot and restore command with insufficient permissions. This issue affects Apache ZooKeeper: from 3.9.0 before 3.9.4. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.4, whi | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2025-58424 | MED 5.3 | f5 big-ip_access_policy_manager On BIG-IP systems, undisclosed traffic can cause data corruption and unauthorized data modification in protocols which do not have message integrity protection. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2025-58413 | HIGH 7.5 | fortinet fortios A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiOS 6.2 all versions, FortiOS 6.0 all versions, FortiSASE 25.3.b | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2025-58412 | MED 4.7 | fortinet fortiadc A improper neutralization of script-related html tags in a web page (basic xss) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiADC 8.0.0, FortiADC 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiADC 7.4 all versions, FortiADC 7.2 all versions may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or comm | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2025-58337 | MED 5.4 | apache doris_mcp_server An attacker with a valid read-only account can bypass Doris MCP Server’s read-only mode due to improper access control, allowing modifications that should have been prevented by read-only restrictions. Impact: Bypasses read-only mode; attackers with read-on | 0.4% | — |