58.518 CVE tracked
796 Exploited now
188 Used by ransomware
Last sync
CVE Tracker
58.518 CVE
Ten vendors followed by CPE identifier, not by keyword: a CVE appears here once NVD says which products it affects — usually a few days after it is published.
| Identifier | Severity, sort descending | Product and flaw | EPSS, sort descending | In KEV since, sorted descending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-15940 | MED 4.1 | fortinet forticlient_enterprise_management_server An improper neutralization of input vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiClientEMS versions 6.4.1 and below and 6.2.9 and below may allow a remote authenticated attacker to inject malicious script/tags via the name parameter of various sections of the server. | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2020-1594 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft 365_apps <p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Excel software when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the current user. If t | 3.9% | — |
| CVE-2020-15939 | MED 4.3 | fortinet fortisandbox An improper access control vulnerability (CWE-284) in FortiSandbox versions 3.2.1 and below and 3.1.4 and below may allow an authenticated, unprivileged attacker to download the device configuration file via the recovery URL. | 0.6% | — |
| CVE-2020-15938 | MED 4.0 | fortinet fortios When traffic other than HTTP/S (eg: SSH traffic, etc...) traverses the FortiGate in version below 6.2.5 and below 6.4.2 on port 80/443, it is not redirected to the transparent proxy policy for processing, as it doesn't have a valid HTTP header. | 0.8% | — |
| CVE-2020-15937 | MED 4.7 | fortinet fortios An improper neutralization of input vulnerability in FortiGate version 6.2.x below 6.2.5 and 6.4.x below 6.4.1 may allow a remote attacker to perform a stored cross site scripting attack (XSS) via the IPS and WAF logs dashboard. | 0.8% | — |
| CVE-2020-15936 | LOW 2.6 | fortinet fortios A improper input validation in Fortinet FortiGate version 6.4.3 and below, version 6.2.5 and below, version 6.0.11 and below, version 5.6.13 and below allows attacker to disclose sensitive information via SNI Client Hello TLS packets. | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2020-15935 | MED 4.3 | fortinet fortiadc A cleartext storage of sensitive information in GUI in FortiADC versions 5.4.3 and below, 6.0.0 and below may allow a remote authenticated attacker to retrieve some sensitive information such as users LDAP passwords and RADIUS shared secret by deobfuscating th | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2020-15934 | HIGH 8.8 | fortinet forticlient An execution with unnecessary privileges vulnerability in the VCM engine of FortiClient for Linux versions 6.2.7 and below, version 6.4.0. may allow local users to elevate their privileges to root by creating a malicious script or program on the target machine | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2020-15933 | MED 5.3 | fortinet fortimail A exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Fortinet FortiMail versions 6.0.9 and below, FortiMail versions 6.2.4 and below FortiMail versions 6.4.1 and 6.4.0 allows attacker to obtain potentially sensitive software-version information via | 0.8% | — |
| CVE-2020-1593 | HIGH 7.6 | microsoft windows_10 <p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Media Audio Decoder improperly handles objects. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system.</p> <p>There are multiple ways an attacker could exp | 2.8% | — |
| CVE-2020-1592 | MED 4.4 | microsoft windows_10 <p>An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly initializes objects in memory.</p> <p>To exploit this vulnerability, an authenticated attacker could run a specially crafted application. An attacker who successfully exploite | 1.2% | — |
| CVE-2020-1591 | MED 5.4 | microsoft dynamics_365 A cross site scripting vulnerability exists when Microsoft Dynamics 365 (on-premises) does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected Dynamics server. An authenticated attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending a specially cr | 1.5% | — |
| CVE-2020-1590 | MED 6.6 | microsoft windows_10 <p>An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service improperly handles file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated privileges on the victim system.</p> < | 0.8% | — |
| CVE-2020-1589 | MED 4.4 | microsoft windows_10 <p>An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user’s system.</p> <p>To exploit this v | 1.3% | — |
| CVE-2020-1587 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a sp | 0.9% | — |
| CVE-2020-15852 | HIGH 7.8 | linux linux_kernel An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel 5.5 through 5.7.9, as used in Xen through 4.13.x for x86 PV guests. An attacker may be granted the I/O port permissions of an unrelated task. This occurs because tss_invalidate_io_bitmap mishandling causes a loss of | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2020-15850 | HIGH 7.8 | nakivo backup_\&_replication_director Insecure permissions in Nakivo Backup & Replication Director version 9.4.0.r43656 on Linux allow local users to access the Nakivo Director web interface and gain root privileges. This occurs because the database containing the users of the web application and | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2020-1585 | HIGH 8.8 | microsoft windows_10 A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Windows Codecs Library handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take control of the affected system. An attacker could then install program | 4.9% | — |
| CVE-2020-1584 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the dnsrslvr.dll handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute code with elevated permissions. To exploit the vulnerability, a locally authentica | 0.9% | — |
| CVE-2020-1583 | HIGH 8.8 | microsoft 365_apps An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Microsoft Word improperly discloses the contents of its memory. An attacker who exploited the vulnerability could use the information to compromise the user’s computer or data. To exploit the vulnerability, a | 4.9% | — |
| CVE-2020-1582 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft 365_apps A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Access software when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the current user. If the | 2.7% | — |
| CVE-2020-1581 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft 365_apps An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Office Click-to-Run (C2R) components handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could elevate privileges. The attacker would need to already have t | 3.7% | — |
| CVE-2020-15801 | CRIT 9.8 | netapp max_data In Python 3.8.4, sys.path restrictions specified in a python38._pth file are ignored, allowing code to be loaded from arbitrary locations. The <executable-name>._pth file (e.g., the python._pth file) is not affected. | 3.5% | — |
| CVE-2020-1580 | MED 5.4 | microsoft sharepoint_enterprise_server A cross-site-scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists when Microsoft SharePoint Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected SharePoint server. An authenticated attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending a specially cra | 1.6% | — |
| CVE-2020-1579 | HIGH 7.8 | microsoft windows_10 An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Function Discovery SSDP Provider improperly handles memory. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to gain execution on the victim system. An attacker could then run a special | 0.9% | — |