57.971 CVE tracked
788 Exploited now
188 Used by ransomware
Last sync
CVE Tracker
57.971 CVE
Ten vendors followed by CPE identifier, not by keyword: a CVE appears here once NVD says which products it affects — usually a few days after it is published.
| Identifier | Severity, sort descending | Product and flaw | EPSS, sort descending | In KEV since, sorted ascending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-43950 | MED 4.3 | fortinet fortinac A URL redirection to untrusted site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability [CWE-601] in FortiNAC-F version 7.2.0, FortiNAC version 9.4.1 and below, 9.2 all versions, 9.1 all versions, 8.8 all versions, 8.7 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to redi | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2022-43949 | MED 6.2 | fortinet fortisiem A use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm [CWE-327] in Fortinet FortiSIEM before 6.7.1 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to perform brute force attacks on GUI endpoints via taking advantage of outdated hashing methods. | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2022-43948 | MED 6.7 | fortinet fortiadc A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Fortinet FortiWeb version 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, FortiADC version 7.1.0 through 7.1.1, FortiADC version 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, FortiADC 6.2 all versions, FortiADC 6.1 a | 0.6% | — |
| CVE-2022-43947 | MED 5.0 | fortinet fortios An improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability [CWE-307] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.3 and before 7.0.10, FortiProxy version 7.2.0 through 7.2.2 and before 7.0.8 administrative interface allows an attacker with a v | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2022-43946 | HIGH 7.5 | fortinet forticlient Multiple vulnerabilities including an incorrect permission assignment for critical resource [CWE-732] vulnerability and a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition [CWE-367] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows before 7.0.7 allows attackers on | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2022-43945 | HIGH 7.5 | linux linux_kernel The Linux kernel NFSD implementation prior to versions 5.19.17 and 6.0.2 are vulnerable to buffer overflow. NFSD tracks the number of pages held by each NFSD thread by combining the receive and send buffers of a remote procedure call (RPC) into a single array | 22.3% | — |
| CVE-2022-43930 | MED 6.2 | ibm db2 IBM Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 10.5, 11.1, and 11.5 is vulnerable to an Information Disclosure as sensitive information may be included in a log file. IBM X-Force ID: 241677. | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2022-43929 | MED 4.9 | ibm db2 IBM Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 11.1 and 11.5 may be vulnerable to a Denial of Service when executing a specially crafted 'Load' command. IBM X-Force ID: 241676. | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2022-43927 | MED 5.9 | ibm db2 IBM Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 10.5, 11.1, and 11.5 is vulnerable to information Disclosure due to improper privilege management when a specially crafted table access is used. IBM X-Force ID: 241671. | 0.6% | — |
| CVE-2022-43917 | MED 5.9 | ibm websphere_application_server IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 traditional container uses weaker than expected cryptographic keys that could allow an attacker to decrypt sensitive information. This affects only the containerized version of WebSphere Application Server traditio | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2022-43910 | HIGH 8.4 | ibm security_guardium IBM Security Guardium 11.3 could allow a local user to escalate their privileges due to improper permission controls. IBM X-Force ID: 240908. | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2022-43908 | MED 4.3 | ibm security_guardium IBM Security Guardium 11.3 could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service due to improper input validation. IBM X-Force ID: 240903. | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2022-43906 | LOW 3.1 | ibm security_guardium IBM Security Guardium 11.5 could disclose sensitive information due to a missing or insecure SameSite attribute for a sensitive cookie. IBM X-Force ID: 240897. | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2022-43903 | MED 4.3 | ibm security_guardium IBM Security Guardium 10.6, 11.3, and 11.4 could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service due to due to improper input validation. IBM X-Force ID: 240894. | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2022-43893 | LOW 2.7 | ibm security_verify_privilege_on-premises IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could allow a privileged user to cause by using a malicious payload. IBM X-Force ID: 240634. | 0.4% | — |
| CVE-2022-43892 | LOW 3.7 | ibm security_verify_privilege_on-premises IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate which could disclose sensitive information which could aid further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 240455. | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2022-43891 | LOW 2.7 | ibm security_verify_privilege_on-premises IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Forc | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2022-43889 | MED 5.3 | ibm security_verify_privilege_on-premises IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could disclose sensitive information through an HTTP request that could aid an attacker in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 240452. | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2022-43875 | MED 6.2 | ibm financial_transaction_manager IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services for Multiplatforms 3.2.4 could allow an authenticated user to lock additional RM authorizations, resulting in a denial of service on displaying or managing these authorizations. IBM X-Force ID: 240034. | 0.2% | — |
| CVE-2022-43872 | MED 5.3 | ibm financial_transaction_manager IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 authorization checks are done incorrectly for some HTTP requests which allows getting unauthorized technical information (e.g. event log entries) about the FTM SWIFT system. IBM X-Force ID: 239708. | 0.5% | — |
| CVE-2022-43869 | MED 6.5 | ibm elastic_storage_system IBM Spectrum Scale (5.1.0.0 through 5.1.2.8 and 5.1.3.0 through 5.1.5.1) and IBM Elastic Storage System (6.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.4 and 6.1.3.0 through 6.1.4.1) could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service through the GUI using a format string a | 1.0% | — |
| CVE-2022-43867 | HIGH 7.8 | ibm spectrum_scale_container_native_storage_access IBM Spectrum Scale 5.1.0.1 through 5.1.4.1 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands in the container. IBM X-Force ID: 239437. | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2022-43863 | MED 6.7 | ibm qradar_security_information_and_event_manager IBM QRadar SIEM 7.4 and 7.5 is vulnerable to privilege escalation, allowing a user with some admin capabilities to gain additional admin capabilities. IBM X-Force ID: 239425. | 0.7% | — |
| CVE-2022-43852 | MED 5.3 | ibm aspera_console IBM Aspera Console 3.4.0 through 3.4.4 could disclose sensitive information in HTTP headers that could be used in further attacks against the system. | 0.3% | — |
| CVE-2022-43851 | MED 5.9 | ibm aspera_console IBM Aspera Console 3.4.0 through 3.4.4 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. | 0.2% | — |